We give UK logistics leaders the independent, evidence-based performance analysis they need to decide whether to stay with their current parcel carrier — or switch — before committing.
You're expected to make a high-stakes commitment based on information designed to sell — not to inform.
National averages hide regional weaknesses. The 99.5% SLA in their pitch might be 96% in your key postcodes.
You're speaking to their best accounts in their best regions. It tells you nothing about how they'll perform for your parcel profile.
A 4-week pilot on 5% of volume delays the decision by months and doesn't generate statistically meaningful insight.
When the new carrier underperforms, it's not the sales rep who faces the board. Service failures, NPS drops, Trustpilot damage — that's your name on the line.
Independent performance evidence specific to your parcel profile, geographies, and services.
We pressure-test the one question that matters: will Carrier B actually perform acceptably for your specific operation compared to Carrier A?
No recommendations. No pricing opinions. Just the evidence you need to commit with confidence — or walk away before it's too late.
A contained, founder-led engagement designed to give you a clear answer within your tender timeline.
We map your parcel profile, key geographies, service priorities, and the carriers on the table.
Independent performance analysis against the specific routes, volumes, and services that matter to your operation.
We identify where the new carrier is likely to underperform and quantify the operational exposure.
A clear, actionable conclusion: switch with confidence, or stay — with the evidence to back either position.
Every alternative leaves the same gap: you still don't know if the new carrier will perform for your specific operation.
Aggregated. Optimistic. Designed to close the deal, not inform the decision.
Selective accounts, different profiles, different geographies. Not transferable.
Months of delay for statistically insignificant sample sizes. Distorts the timeline.
Optimise the tender process. Don't actually answer whether the switch will work for you.
At the end of this engagement, you'll be able to say with confidence: we have enough evidence to switch — or enough evidence not to.
Performance evidence mapped to your actual parcel volumes, geographies, and service requirements. Not national averages.
Clear identification of where the new carrier is likely to underperform, and what that means for your SLAs and customers.
A clear, defensible conclusion you can present to leadership. Evidence-backed, not opinion-based.
This work is led personally by Matteo — not handed off to a junior analyst or run through a software tool.
The approach is grounded in professional judgement and real decision context, from someone who has personally owned carrier tenders and lived with the consequences of getting it wrong.
This is most valuable when a real switching decision is expected within 90 days. If there's no imminent tender, it's usually better to wait.
If you're a Head of Logistics facing a real carrier switching decision, this work can help you pressure-test it before you commit.
Book a call →